April 2018

GM Food Labels Could Burden Low-Income Consumers

Undark Magazine / Read Full Article

February 2018

Bill Gates calls GMOs 'perfectly healthy'      — and scientists say he's right

Business Insider / Read Full Article

August 2016

We're saving fuel, we're saving trips over the field, wear and tear on our machinery, the fatigue of the person doing it. Not to mention the carbon footprint we used to have, is not there anymore.

Marketplace / Read Full Article

June 2016

The scientific consensus is that that gene editing in a laboratory is not more hazardous than modifications through traditional breeding, and that engineered plants potentially have environmental or health benefits, such as cutting down on the need for pesticides.

Washington Post / Read Full Article

May 2016

Genetically engineered crops appear to be safe to eat and do not harm the environment, according to a comprehensive new analysis by the advisory group the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine.

New York Times / Read Full Article

February 2016

Every authority agrees, GMO labeling is not about food safety.  It is about food industry market share.  

The Hill / Read Full Article

October 2012

Indeed, the science is quite clear: crop improvement by the modern molecular techniques of biotechnology is safe.  

American Association for the Advancement of Science / Read Full Statement


The main conclusion to be drawn from the efforts of more than 130 research projects, covering a period of more than 25 years of research and involving more than 500 independent research groups, is that biotechnology, and in particular GMOs, are not per se more risky than e.g. conventional plant breeding technologies  

European Commission Report / Read Full Report